Post by account_disabled on Feb 22, 2024 19:12:42 GMT 10
If you wish, you can find many similar stories on the Internet. There is only one nuance - almost all of them talk about successful cases. The following examples are often mentioned: when Mitch Kapor was creating a small program for his friend, it ended up creating the Lotus 1-2-3 spreadsheet and Lotus Development Corporation. Or how link collecting allowed David Philo to found Yahoo!. Not to mention a beautiful tale about how an ordinary student invented a social network and became fabulously rich. All this impresses and fascinates, just like the stories about people who mined mountains of gold and became fabulously rich. But in reality, most startups remain unknown to anyone. It is extremely difficult to find sufficiently detailed statistics, it seems that they are not kept at all. But even from what is there, a depressing picture is formed. Yes, the senior director of Cisco, Christopher Thompson,
A beautiful fairy tale, is sure that more than 90% of startups are Ecuador WhatsApp Number doomed to failure. In his opinion, the reason for this lies in the fact that most startups actually simply copy existing ones, their creators try to follow already copied paths. After all, only those initiatives that brought with them not just something new, but something innovative, capable of making a serious impact on people's lives, really took off. Thompson cites eBay, Netflix and PayPal as examples. In addition, there is an opinion that only a good idea is enough for a startup. And you don't need to work a lot and for a long time, everything will come quickly and in large quantities. Business rules are percee, which is many times larger than all the previous ones (however, this is a common phenomenon - each subsequent bubble is always larger than the previous one).
And on the day when it bursts, the legendary "dotcom crash" will seem nothing but nonsense. By the way, the very word "startup" first became widely used during the first "dotcom bubble". For example, there is an opinion that the same Facebook is excessively overrated. The corporation is clearly not worth the money it is valued at. The Instagram story is no less vivid example . Mark Zuckerberg's creation, according to many analysts and financiers, is nothing more than a pyramid built on IT. Meanwhile, a rather interesting trend is observed - the word "startup" is gradually becoming something annoying, which causes a negative reaction among ordinary Internet users. Especially against the background of a pronounced tendency to call a startup almost any undertaking that has nothing to do with startups at all.
A beautiful fairy tale, is sure that more than 90% of startups are Ecuador WhatsApp Number doomed to failure. In his opinion, the reason for this lies in the fact that most startups actually simply copy existing ones, their creators try to follow already copied paths. After all, only those initiatives that brought with them not just something new, but something innovative, capable of making a serious impact on people's lives, really took off. Thompson cites eBay, Netflix and PayPal as examples. In addition, there is an opinion that only a good idea is enough for a startup. And you don't need to work a lot and for a long time, everything will come quickly and in large quantities. Business rules are percee, which is many times larger than all the previous ones (however, this is a common phenomenon - each subsequent bubble is always larger than the previous one).
And on the day when it bursts, the legendary "dotcom crash" will seem nothing but nonsense. By the way, the very word "startup" first became widely used during the first "dotcom bubble". For example, there is an opinion that the same Facebook is excessively overrated. The corporation is clearly not worth the money it is valued at. The Instagram story is no less vivid example . Mark Zuckerberg's creation, according to many analysts and financiers, is nothing more than a pyramid built on IT. Meanwhile, a rather interesting trend is observed - the word "startup" is gradually becoming something annoying, which causes a negative reaction among ordinary Internet users. Especially against the background of a pronounced tendency to call a startup almost any undertaking that has nothing to do with startups at all.